Tag Archives: care

How does Canada deal with citizens who rob the medical care $system by eating crap foods they know are bad?

Suppose you have Patient A and Patient B.

Patient A is diabetic because he/she has a high risk that runs in the gene pool and Patient A exercised all health recommendations and could not avoid treatment.

Patient B was born with a low risk of diabetes, but is a complete idiot. He/she eats 36 butter tarts per day and chugs down 60 ounches of coke every morning. Friends warned Patient B to eat healthier, but the person always said “I like buttertarts and I’m a coke-a-holic, what can I say?” And he/she said “THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY, I HAVE A RIGHT TO CONSUME WHAT I PLEASE.”

Now Patient A needs treatment in the next 3 weeks or may otherwise die, but the sooner the better.

Patient B, the idiot, needs treatment in less than a week or may die.

Who should be treated first? Is there a just solution to this question?

There’s a continuum where one extreme is having a Food Nazi Gestapo, and the other end of the spectrum is people have no drive to preserve the medical care system for the people who need it the most.
well lets make it PAtient B needs treatment in 2.25 weeks time, Patient A in 3 weeks.
And I think I’ve come up with the best solution of all.

1) We can’t dictate the choices people make in a democracy, but we can have “health/nutrition education” in primary and secondary schools! That should be part of the curriculum.

2) Canada can require Canadians citizens to take a 3-hour health seminar as a requirement to renew your Driver’s License. Since driving is a privilege and not a RIGHT, this would not be a violation of a person’s rights.
I NEVER eat McDonalds either.

But perhaps there should be a fruits and vegetable health restaurant that has a drive-thru and fast pre-made health foods.
I NEVER eat McDonalds either.

But perhaps there should be a fruits and vegetable health restaurant that has a drive-thru and fast pre-made health foods.

Has this country has gone too far in helping illegal aliens and catering to minorities?

I know of a woman from Thailand that is here on a green card, is getting food and housing paid by the state (or federal)government, and her daughter (here legally) is getting paid (by the government) to take care of her!!!
My mother-in-law has lived and worked her entire 75 years in the USA and can only collect a measily $485 a month in social security.
Is it just me, or is there something drastically wrong with this?
The government has lowered test scores for minorities trying for civil service jobs because a “percentage” of minorities are REQUIRED but they couldn’t pass the damn tests! Isn’t this lowering the quality of our services? I don’t want a fireman that only got 70% on his test scores coming to my rescue when a person that scored 80% didn’t get the job because that department was REQUIRED to pass the minority!
Now many areas are forcing our school kids to learn Spanish because the spanish people don’t want to learn English!
Oh, and I can’t say Merry Christmas any more!

2010 Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation – Federal Guidance for a Nuclear Bomb Attack on an American City, Effects, Fallout, Shelter, Medical Care, Decontamination

2010 Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation – Federal Guidance for a Nuclear Bomb Attack on an American City, Effects, Fallout, Shelter, Medical Care, Decontamination

2010 Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation - Federal Guidance for a Nuclear Bomb Attack on an American City, Effects, Fallout, Shelter, Medical Care, Decontamination

This 2010 second edition of the Federal report, Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation, has been the subject of major news reports on revised thinking about shelter-in-place response to a nuclear attack. It provides emergency planners with nuclear detonation-specific response recommendations to maximize the preservation of life in the event of an urban nuclear detonation. One of the most catastrophic incidents that could befall the United States, causing enormous loss of life and property and severely damaging economic viability, is a nuclear detonation in a US city. For this guidance, a nominal 10 KT (kiloton) yield nuclear device is assumed for the purposes of estimating impacts in high-density urban areas. Local and state community preparedness to respond could result in life-saving on the order of tens of thousands of lives. This guidance addresses the unique effects and impacts of a nuclear detonation such as scale of destruction, shelter and evacuation strategies, medical demands, management of nuclear casualties, and radiation dose management concepts. This guidance is aimed at response activities in an environment with a severely compromised infrastructure for the first few days when it is likely that many Federal resources will still be en route to the incident. Target audiences are response planners and their leadership, including elected officials, emergency managers, planners for law enforcement, fire, emergency medical, haz mat, utility services, transportation, hospitals, and others. Contents include: Nuclear Detonation Effects and Impacts in an Urban Environment, Blast, Blast Injuries, Thermal Radiation, Thermal Injuries, Radiation and Fallout, Combined Injuries, EMP, Zoned Approach to Nuclear Detonation Response, Functions and Priorities, Worker Safety, Shelter and Evacuation Recommendations, Protective Actions, Planning Considerations, Early Medical Care, Initial Mass Casualty Triage, Emergency Care, Fatality Management, Population Monitoring and Decontamination, Impacted Population, External and Internal Contamination, Mutual Aid Programs, Acronyms, Definitions. There are no clear boundaries between damage zones resulting from a nuclear detonation; some injuries such as eye and blast injuries can be prevented or reduced in severity if individuals that perceive an intense and unexpected flash of light seek immediate cover; EMP could result in extensive electronics disruptions complicating the function of communications, computers, and other essential electronics; the most hazardous fallout particles are readily visible as fine, sand-sized grains, but the lack of apparent fallout should not be misrepresented to mean radiation is not present; fallout that is immediately hazardous to the public and emergency responders will descend to the ground within about 24 hours; and the most effective life-saving opportunities for response officials in the first 60 minutes following a nuclear explosion will be the decision to safely shelter or evacuate people in expected fallout areas. This guidance was developed by a Federal interagency committee, the Homeland Security Council Interagency Policy Coordination Subcommittee for Preparedness and Response to Radiological and Nuclear Threats, with representation from the Executive Office of the President (Homeland Security Council and Office of Science and Technology Policy), the Departments of Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Transportation, Veteran’s Affairs, the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

This is a privately authored news service and educational publication of Progressive Management. Our publications synthesize official government information with original material – they are not produced by the federal government.This 2010 second edition of the Federal report, Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation, has been the subject of major news reports on revised thinking about shelter-in-place response to a nuclear attack. It provides emergency planners with nuclear detonation-specific response recommendations to maximize the preservation of life in the event of an urban nuclear detonation. One of the most catastrophic incidents that could befall the United States, causing enormous loss of life and property and severely damaging economic viability, is a nuclear detonation in a US city. For this guidance, a nominal 10 KT (kiloton) yield nuclear device is assumed for the purposes of estimating impacts in high-density urban areas. Local and state community preparedness to respond could result in life-saving on the order of tens of thousands of lives. This guidance addresses the unique effects and impacts of a nuclear detonation such as scale of destruction, shelter and evacuation strategies, medical demands, management of nuclear casualties, and radiation dose management concepts. This guidance is aimed at response activities in an environment with a severely compromised infrastructure for the first few days when it is likely that many Federal resources will still be en route to the incident. Target audiences are response planners and their leadership, including elected officials, emergency managers, planners for law enforcement, fire, emergency medical, haz mat, utility services, transportation, hospitals, and others. Contents include: Nuclear Detonation Effects and Impacts in an Urban Environment, Blast, Blast Injuries, Thermal Radiation, Thermal Injuries, Radiation and Fallout, Combined Injuries, EMP, Zoned Approach to Nuclear Detonation Response, Functions and Priorities, Worker Safety, Shelter and Evacuation Recommendations, Protective Actions, Planning Considerations, Early Medical Care, Initial Mass Casualty Triage, Emergency Care, Fatality Management, Population Monitoring and Decontamination, Impacted Population, External and Internal Contamination, Mutual Aid Programs, Acronyms, Definitions. There are no clear boundaries between damage zones resulting from a nuclear detonation; some injuries such as eye and blast injuries can be prevented or reduced in severity if individuals that perceive an intense and unexpected flash of light seek immediate cover; EMP could result in extensive electronics disruptions complicating the function of communications, computers, and other essential electronics; the most hazardous fallout particles are readily visible as fine, sand-sized grains, but the lack of apparent fallout should not be misrepresented to mean radiation is not present; fallout that is immediately hazardous to the public and emergency responders will descend to the ground within about 24 hours; and the most effective life-saving opportunities for response officials in the first 60 minutes following a nuclear explosion will be the decision to safely shelter or evacuate people in expected fallout areas. This guidance was developed by a Federal interagency committee, the Homeland Security Council Interagency Policy Coordination Subcommittee for Preparedness and Response to Radiological and Nuclear Threats, with representation from the Executive Office of the President (Homeland Security Council and Office of Science and Technology Policy), the Departments of Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Transportation, Veteran’s Affairs, the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

This is a privately authored news service and educational publication of Progressive Management. Our publications synthesize official government information with original material – they are not produced by the federal government.

List Price: $ 9.99

Price:

RHINO BUNKER--fully customizable bugout/fallout shelter

US $13,999.99
End Date: Friday May-25-2012 7:12:03 PDT
Buy It Now for only: US $13,999.99
Buy it now | Add to watch list
Fallout Shelter Sign, Authentic 10" x 14" Metal
US $9.75 (0 Bid)
End Date: Friday May-25-2012 18:30:12 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

What to Do Before, During and After Emergency or Disaster: A Preparedness Toolkit for Office-Based Health Care Practices

What to Do Before, During and After Emergency or Disaster: A Preparedness Toolkit for Office-Based Health Care Practices

What to Do Before, During and After Emergency or Disaster: A Preparedness Toolkit for Office-Based Health Care Practices

When disaster strikes, the ability to keep providing clinical services during and after the event depends on being prepared. With an emergency plan in place and the right information to make rapid decisions, you could save both your health care business and the lives of your patients. TheWhat to do Before, During, and After an Emergency or Disaster: A Preparedness Toolkit for Office-based Health Care Practicesgives health care professionals the tools they need to be ready for the unexpected.


To help you plan for the worst of events, this invaluable resource provides essential information on how to:

” assess likely hazards in your community
” identify the challenges you may encounter during and after an emergency
” define the roles and responsibilities critical to communication
” develop emergency response plans

List Price: $ 35.00

Price: $ 23.63

Why does America take care of people in Foreign places and not our own people?

Can anyone answer me why we send food to everyone else, and we have people without food, clothes,shelter, here living in america?