Tag Archives: contest

On “Equality”. Any flaws in reasoning?

Equality is the assertion that ‘all men are created equal’ and that consequently, we are entitled to the same ‘unalienable rights’. I contest the former point, as we are constituted of attributes such as, but not limited to, intelligence and physical prowess. In a competitive environment, as in nature, how well we fulfill these criterion will determine whether or not we survive; natural selection will take its pick based on the inherent inequality within us. Thus, when a persons is quantified based on the ‘net survival skill’ he/she has, and compared to that of an ‘inferior’ being, the relation would be p1>p2 instead of p1=p2. It would thus not be logical for the relatively inferior human to be deemed the equal of a being superior in all aspects of life (this will not be subjective if they are assessed by a rubric).

This inequality does not connote any thing in the field of politics. Whether morality and ethics are intrinsic or empirical, we have learned to embrace ‘inequality’, as the alternative would be mass genocide and forced sterilization, as witnessed by the Third Reich’s Holocaust. We have learned to empathize with and accept the flaws of one another, and have established laws because of this capability. Equality is thus nonexistent, but we must not discriminate because of this. //

What are the weak points? Any logical fallacies? Anything you agree/disagree with? Which points could I expand upon? Thanks in advance!
What do you mean?

Do you like my essay?

I entered an essay contest here are the rules:

http://snakeriverlanding.com/news/

don’t be afraid to critisize!

Ever since I was a newborn, Idaho Falls has been the greatest city I’ve ever seen. I’ve lived here all my life and have loved it every second of it. It brings me great pleasure to write about what sets this town apart from other towns. And also to discover what it might be like twenty-five years ago.

There are many ways that set Idaho Falls apart from other Idaho cities. One of them includes an ever popular sport, skiing. Idaho Falls is prime distance from many of the greatest skiing spots in the world. Such as: Grand Targhee, Kelly Canyon, and perhaps the most famous of all, Sun Valley. Another reason is the strong, family oriented community. It just warms your heart when you see a food drive or someone helping the homeless.

25 years from now Idaho Falls will be even greater! I’m betting Idaho Falls will be more industrialized, but will still have a living ecosystem that other major cities do not. In fact, Idaho Falls will have doubled in population and size. Also, I deduce that Idaho Falls residents will realize to preserve the environment and not intoxicate it with pollution. Idaho Falls is cleaner than a whistle.

What a treat it will be to live in our town 25 years later! By then everyone will be happy and secure in a larger city. More businesses will surface and offer more jobs. This will help the poor realize their potential and obtain jobs of their own. Idaho Falls will be more fun than a barrel of monkeys.

Because of all these reasons Idaho Falls can and will become an even better city. It will evolve into a healthy and prosperous town. In conclusion, Idaho Falls is, and will be one of the greatest places to live in all of Idaho.

My story for a writing contest (different story)?

Titanic—Rose’s Story
A novelization of the script
Written by James Cameron
Adapted by Olivia
Based on “Titanic: James Cameron’s Illustrated Screenplay”
My name is Rose Calvert. Two years ago I started my second century of life. In my long life, I have done many things. I have been married and widowed. I have raised children, watched them raise my grandchildren, and now watch them raise my great-grandchildren. But I have also acted in silent pictures. I have flown a plane. I have ridden a horse in the surf. But all of these things I might have never done had it not been for one man, one man whom I think of and thank every day of my so-long life. I had not spoken of him in over 80 years, keeping him close to my own heart, but last year something happened that changed my mind.
It was the summer of 2005 and I was sitting in my glassed-in studio that was attached to the living room of my small house in Ojai, California, throwing a pot on my potter’s wheel. The liquid red clay covered my hands…hands that might be gnarled and age-spotted, but were still surprisingly strong and supple.
My forty-year-old granddaughter, Elizabeth Calvert, who I call Lizzie, was in the kitchen, opening a can of dog food for my Pomeranian, Freddy. I will always be grateful to Lizzie for taking care of me for the last ten-twenty years so that I can continue to live in my own home—no nursing homes for this old lady! As the can opener buzzed, I could barely hear the small television set sitting on counter, so it was simply background noise, until a certain word caught my attention.
It was one of those news programs and the announcer was saying, “Treasure-hunter Brock Lovett is best known for finding Spanish gold in sunken galleons in the Caribbean. Now he is using deep submergence technology to work 2 ½ miles down at another famous wreck…the Titanic.”
Hearing that name, I turned off my wheel and began wiping the clay from my hands with a rag as I listened more carefully. The announcer was saying, “He is with us live via satellite from a Russian research ship in the middle of the Atlantic. Hello, Brock?”
And for the first time, I heard the voice of Brock Lovett, treasure hunter: “Yes, hi, Tracy. You know, Titanic is not just a shipwreck, Titanic is the shipwreck. It’s the Mount Everest of shipwrecks. I’ve planned this expedition for three years, and we’re out here recovering some amazing things…things that will have enormous historical and educational value.”
Hearing this, I rose from my stool, took my cane and slowly began walking towards the kitchen. As I walked, the announcer’s voice sounded skeptical. “But it’s no secret that education is not your main purpose. You’re a treasure hunter. Your expedition is at the center of a storm of controversy over salvage rights and even ethics. Many are calling you a grave robber.”
Entering the kitchen, I told Lizzie, “Turn that up, dear,” and after she did, I could clearly hear the sneer in Mr. Lovett’s voice. “Nobody called the recovery of the artifacts from King Tut’s tomb grave robbing. I have museum-trained experts here, making sure this stuff is preserved and catalogued properly. Look at this drawing, which was found today, a piece of paper that’s been underwater for 84 years…and my team was able to preserve it intact. Should this have remained unseen at the bottom of the ocean for eternity, when we can see it and enjoy it now?”
As he spoke, I was standing right next to the television set, staring at the screen, which showed an old, old pencil drawing still in excellent condition except for its partially-disintegrated edges. The drawing showed a beautiful young woman, beautifully rendered. In her late teens or early twenties, she was nude, though posed with a kind of casual modesty. She was on an Empire divan, in a pool of light that seemed to radiate outward from her eyes. Scrawled in the lower right hand corner is the date: April 14, 1912.
The girl was not totally nude. At her throat was a diamond necklace with one large stone hanging in the center.
Staring at that drawing I had to say the only thing I could think: “I’ll be goddamned.”
That program was the beginning of my journey. When I told Lizzie what I wanted to do, she was certain that I had finally lost my faculties, but since she loves me, she humored me. She telephoned the local television station, which transferred her to the network. When they found out what I wanted and why, they connected me with the Russian research ship, and a Mr. Bobby Buell, who represented the partners who were bankrolling the expedition.
When I told him what I wanted, he told me to “hang on”, then I could hear him running, Soon I could hear his feet running back and his voice saying, “You gotta speak up; she’s kinda old,” and I smiled before I heard the same brash, impatient voice I had heard on the television set. “This is Brock Lovett. What can I do for you, Mrs….”
“Calvert,” I introduced myself. “Rose Calvert.”
“Mrs. Calv

On “Equality”. Any flaws in reasoning?

Equality is the assertion that ‘all men are created equal’ and that consequently, we are entitled to the same ‘unalienable rights’. I contest the former point, as we are constituted of attributes such as, but not limited to, intelligence and physical prowess. In a competitive environment, as in nature, how well we fulfill these criterion will determine whether or not we survive; natural selection will take its pick based on the inherent inequality within us. Thus, when a persons is quantified based on the ‘net survival skill’ he/she has, and compared to that of an ‘inferior’ being, the relation would be p1>p2 instead of p1=p2. It would thus not be logical for the relatively inferior human to be deemed the equal of a being superior in all aspects of life (this will not be subjective if they are assessed by a rubric).

This inequality does not connote any thing in the field of politics. Whether morality and ethics are intrinsic or empirical, we have learned to embrace ‘inequality’, as the alternative would be mass genocide and forced sterilization, as witnessed by the Third Reich’s Holocaust. We have learned to empathize with and accept the flaws of one another, and have established laws because of this capability. Equality is thus nonexistent, but we must not discriminate because of this. //

What are the weak points? Any logical fallacies? Anything you agree/disagree with? Which points could I expand upon? Thanks in advance!
What do you mean?

Green Arrow versus Hawkeye versus robin hood?

ok here the situation. Green Arrow, Hawkeye, and a modern day robin hood( black guy this time) are at a archery contest and are judges. they’ve been disagreening all day and their tempers have boiled over. they come to a single agreement, a 3 part battle royal. im not talking firing on a target type contest either im talking about a contest that will test all aspect of their combat skills, their agility, their survival skills, their wit, and their full on archery prowess. what would the three contest be, who would win and why.